The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.02

68.02 Ne exeat.—

(1) WHEN TO ISSUE.—No writ of ne exeat shall be granted until a verified complaint is filed demanding the writ. It may issue in any case in equity, including support as defined in s. 409.2554, when the issuance is just.

(2) JUDGE TO FIX PENALTY OF BOND.—In granting the writ the court shall fix the penalty and conditions of the bond with surety to be approved by the clerk to be required of plaintiff in favor of defendant. The writ shall not issue until the bond is given.

(3) ABSENCE FROM STATE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS PERMITTED.—An absence of the defendant from the state from which he or she returns before a personal appearance is necessary or before it is necessary to perform any order of the court is not a breach of the condition of the bond.

(4) SURRENDER OF DEFENDANT BY SURETIES.—The surety of defendant has the right personally or by attorney at any time before the bond is forfeited to take the body of the principal and surrender him or her in open court or deliver him or her to the executive officer of the court, who shall detain the principal as in cases of the surrender of the principal by special bail. At the time of delivery to the officer, the surety shall take a receipt for the body and file it with the clerk. If done before the bond is forfeited, the surrender or delivery discharges the surety from his or her undertaking.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, Nov. 7, 1828; RS 1473-1476; GS 1921-1924; RGS 3184-3187; CGL 4976-4979; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 22, ch. 67-254; s. 12, ch. 92-138; s. 354, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former ss. 62.18-62.21.

F.S. 68.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FALLEN v. GREP SOUTHWEST, LLC SCI LLC, d b a d b a LLC LLC., 247 F. Supp. 3d 1165 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 68.02, at 68-4 (1979). . . .

L. GEARREN, v. THE McGRAW- HILL COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, N. H. B. L. J. H. IV, L. C. A. P., 660 F.3d 605 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . their class action complaint on June 12, 2009, following a drop in the price of McGraw-Hill stock from $68.02 . . .

L. GEARREN v. McGRAW- HILL COMPANIES, INC. On v., 690 F. Supp. 2d 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . ¶ 2) — the price of McGraw-Hill common stock dedined from $68.02 per share at the outset to $24.23 . . .

WEISS, v. REGAL COLLECTIONS, 385 F.3d 337 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . See 13 Moore’s Federal Practice § 68.02[2], at 68-7 (3d ed.2004) (“The primary purpose of Rule 68 is . . .

In MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC., 302 B.R. 408 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2003)

. . . International Inn, Inc. 16 B.R. 308, 313 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1981) (citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, P. 68.02 . . .

D. HANLON, v. TOWN OF MILTON,, 186 F.3d 831 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 68.02 provides that final determinations are reviewable; Wis. . . . Stat. § 68.02(1). . . . First, § 68.03 excepts § 68.02 from its reach: “Except as provided in § 68.02, the following determinations . . . and the exception of § 68.02 included at the beginning of § 68.03. . . . Stat. § 68.02(1). . . .

ORTIZ, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF CITY COMMISSIONERS VOTER REGISTRATION DIVISION,, 824 F. Supp. 514 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . White Minority * WARDS 41-66 White Minority YEAR: 1985 49.40% 50.60% 68.24% 31.76% 1986 49.31 50.69 68.02 . . .

In HANCOCK B. JARBOE, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,, 137 B.R. 835 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1992)

. . . supra, §§ 7, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 36, 61, 64, 74, 75; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 68.02 . . .

E. WHITCHER v. TOWN OF MATTHEWS,, 136 F.R.D. 582 (W.D.N.C. 1991)

. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, par. 68.02 on page 68-4 (West 1990) (hereinafter “Moore’s”). . . .

YATES, d b a E. K. d b a v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 928 F.2d 199 (6th Cir. 1991)

. . . 3-3-84,” and that Deaton needed “the down-payment of $126.78 plus the first payment due 4-18-84 of $68.02 . . .

STAPLES, v. WICKESBERG,, 122 F.R.D. 541 (E.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . Sinclair, Moore’s Federal Practice para. 68.02 (2d ed. 1987); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. . . .

GULF COAST HOME HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 527 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Rule 10D-68.02(19), Florida Administrative Code. . . . Rule 10D-68.02(20), Florida Administrative Code. . . .

MAUDSLEY, v. NAVARRO,, 510 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . in custody pursuant to a writ of ne exeat, entered pursuant to Florida Statutes sections 61.11 and 68.02 . . .

In GOLDEN GULF, LTD. L. BOYER, v. JOHNSON, L. BOYER, v. NARENDRAN C., 73 B.R. 685 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1987)

. . . which exercised such discretion under the general principles of equity." 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.02 . . .

O CONNOR, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 622 F. Supp. 611 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . See 4 Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02[1] (14th ed.1978). . . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .

STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. UNITED STATES, 8 Cl. Ct. 693 (Ct. Cl. 1985)

. . . Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 68.02 (2d ed. 1981). . . .

HOME HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 463 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . .- (1981); Rules 10-5.02(15)(16) and (17), 10-5.04(7), and 100-68.02(18), Florida Administrative Code . . .

In UTICA FLOOR MAINTENANCE, INC. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, v. UTICA FLOOR MAINTENANCE, INC., 41 B.R. 941 (N.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .

In WALLER, R. STONITSCH, v. M. WALLER,, 28 B.R. 850 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1983)

. . . which exercises such discretion under the general principles of equity.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.02 . . .

In ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL INN, INC. ARTUS, v. ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION,, 16 B.R. 308 (Bankr. D. Alaska 1981)

. . . See, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 68.02 at pp. 852-854, (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In BRENDERN ENTERPRISES, INC. BRENDERN ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MICRO- ACOUSTICS CORPORATION,, 12 B.R. 458 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. v. AUGUST, 450 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1981)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 68.02, p. 68-4 (1979). . . .

ANDERSON FOREIGN MOTORS, INC. v. NEW ENGLAND TOYOTA DISTRIBUTOR, INC., 492 F. Supp. 1383 (D. Mass. 1980)

. . . See generally, Von Kalinowski, 9 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, § 68.02. . . . Von Kalinowski, supra, § 68.02[4], n. 34; Federal Trade Comm’n v. A. E. . . .

RIGGS, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 623 F.2d 68 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1010, 91 S.Ct. 564, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .

RIGGS, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 623 F.2d 68 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1010, 91 S.Ct. 564, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .

GAY, v. WAITERS AND DAIRY LUNCHMEN S UNION, LOCAL NO. No. No. St. a Co. a d b a s No. a d b a a d b a a d b a Ya Co. d b a d b a, 86 F.R.D. 500 (N.D. Cal. 1980)

. . . encourage settlements and avoid protracted litigation.” 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, Second Edition ¶ 68.02 . . .

In FERNANDES SUPER MARKETS, INC. FERNANDES SUPER MARKETS, INC. v. BUTTERFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 1 B.R. 299 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1979)

. . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .

In BOHACK CORPORATION, v. BORDEN, INC., 599 F.2d 1160 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶68.02 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .

SKINNER, v. W. T. GRANT COMPANY A. DANKO v. W. T. GRANT COMPANY, 1 B.R. 484 (E.D. La. 1979)

. . . however, neither is “[a] set-off under § 68 . automatic or self-executing.” 4 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . . Logan, supra); accord, 4 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02[1], at 851-52, & cases cited at nn.14-16. . . .

CISSELL, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI,, 476 F. Supp. 474 (S.D. Ohio 1979)

. . . which exercises such discretion under the general principles of equity.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .

J. ALLEGAERT, v. H. PEROT, 466 F. Supp. 516 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . receiving only partial, if any, dividends on any claim he might establish. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 68.02 . . .

M. FEINBLATT, v. BLOCK, 456 F. Supp. 776 (D. Md. 1978)

. . . Phelps, 283 F.2d 261, 264-65 (9th Cir. 1960); see generally 4 Collier, supra, ¶¶ 68.02, 68.03, 68.08, . . .

J. SCHERIFF, v. BECK, 452 F. Supp. 1254 (D. Colo. 1978)

. . . E.D.La.1975); 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1471; 7 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 68.02 . . .

WESTERN LAND PLANNING COMPANY, R. v. MIDLAND NATIONAL BANK, MIDLAND NATIONAL BANK, v. R. RINGBLOOM E., 434 F. Supp. 616 (E.D. Wis. 1977)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 68.02 and 68.03 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .

In Co. BEN HYMAN CO. INC. v. FULTON NATIONAL BANK,, 423 F. Supp. 1006 (N.D. Ga. 1976)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02. . . .

In WILLIAMS, 422 F. Supp. 342 (N.D. Ga. 1976)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 68.02[1]. . . .

J. ROCHELLE, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 521 F.2d 844 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 68.02[1] and 68.03. . . . suit by the trustee against a third party on a debt owed to the bankrupt. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . . The statute is misquoted in § 68.02[1] of Collier, text at n. 2 where it reads “allowed and paid” instead . . .

PREFERRED SURFACING, INC. v. GWINNETT BANK TRUST COMPANY,, 400 F. Supp. 280 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . See generally 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02. . . .

In BEL MARIN DRIWALL, INC. O. v. B. GROVER,, 470 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . rights as to setoff unless there is something in the Act specifically so doing.” 4 Collier, supra, |f 68.02 . . .

v., 19 Ohio Misc. 25 (N.D. Ohio 1969)

. . . Practice, Paragraph 68.02. . . .

A. STAFFEND v. LAKE CENTRAL AIRLINES, INC., 47 F.R.D. 218 (N.D. Ohio 1969)

. . . Pract., ¶68.02. . . .

I. PALMER, Jr. Co. B B v. C. STOKELY, K. A., 259 F. Supp. 776 (W.D. Okla. 1966)

. . . Andrews, supra; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 4, Sec. 68.02, page 719-734 Inch Also, Collier . . . on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 4, Sec. 68.02, pages 711-712, states: “Despite the seemingly mandatory . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. BRUNNER, In L. BROWN E., 282 F.2d 535 (10th Cir. 1960)

. . . re Progressive Wallpaper Corp., D.C.N.D.N.Y., 240 E. 807; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14 Ed., Vol. 4, § 68.02 . . .

INTER- STATE NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY, v. LUTHER, GARDEN GRAIN SEED COMPANY,, 221 F.2d 382 (10th Cir. 1955)

. . . than import the time-honored doctrine of equitable setoff into the bankruptcy law. 4 Collier §§ 68.01-68.02 . . .

MARTIN TIRE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES Of AMERICA,, 130 F. Supp. 316 (S.D. Fla. 1955)

. . . January 1952 February 20, 1952 139.04 February 1952 March 25, 1952 84.90 March 1952 April 22, 1952 68.02 . . .

A. BRUST, v. R. STURR,, 128 F. Supp. 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . Bank, 1913, 229 U.S. 523, 33 S.Ct. 806, 57 L.Ed. 1313; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 (14 ed.1942). . . .