Cases from cite.case.law:

A. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES Ad, 273 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . the child's manifest best interests, while the trial court addressed each statutory factor in section 39.810 . . .

In INTEREST OF C. E. a K. E. v. Ad, 263 So. 3d 202 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . and Least Restrictive Means The Department is required to prove all of the elements listed in section 39.810 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad o b o P. R. v. A. R. R. L., 253 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . recommendations for the child provided by the child's guardian ad litem or legal representative. § 39.810 . . . See § 39.810(10). . . . Section 39.810 states that "the court shall consider and evaluate all relevant factors, including, but . . . not limited to" the enumerated eleven factors. § 39.810 (emphasis added). . . . of the child and including factual findings in accordance with the eleven factors set forth section 39.810 . . .

IN INTEREST OF X. W. a Ad v. C. W., 255 So. 3d 882 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 39.810(5). . . . See § 39.810(2). It found that C.W. lacked the current capacity to care for X.W. such that X.W.' . . . See § 39.810(3). . . . See § 39.810(7). . . . See § 39.810(11). . . .

IN INTEREST OF K. W. K. W. Ad v. J. W. M. W., 234 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

. . . 18 So.3d 1170, 1178-79 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (reversing where the trial court’s findings under section 39.810 . . .

T. H. S. D. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 226 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2015), sets forth a list of non-exhaustive factors for a court to consider . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE AND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 213 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Under the provisions of sections 39.810(1)—(11), Florida Statutes, it is in the manifest best interests . . . Under the provisions of sections 39.810(l)-(] 1), Florida Statutes, it is in the manifest best interests . . .

D. H. S. R. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 211 So. 3d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . under section 39.806, the termination is in the manifest best interest of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

In J. W. a M. S. v. Ad, 210 So. 3d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . must then consider whether termination is in the manifest best interest of the child under section 39.810 . . . The trial court properly found that termination was in J.W.’s manifest best interest under section 39.810 . . .

S. M. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 202 So. 3d 769 (Fla. 2016)

. . . would be in the manifest best interests of the children, under the considerations required by section 39.810 . . . “the manifest best interests of the child” by evaluating the relevant factors listed under section 39.810 . . . Pursuant to section 39.810, these factors include: (1) Any suitable permanent custody arrangement with . . . recommendations for the child provided by the child’s guardian ad litem or legal representative. § 39.810 . . . It also found that termination was in the manifest best interests of the children under section 39.810 . . .

M. C. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 186 So. 3d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2015). The Mother’s appeal followed. IV. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad v. B. C. C. S., 185 So. 3d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . 39.806, Florida Statutes; that termination is in the child’s manifest best interests under section 39.810 . . . emotional ties between child and parent are part of the manifest best interest analysis, see section 39.810 . . .

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, v. M. H. W. S., 184 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . under section 39.806 and then must consider the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 . . .

J. P. T. P. a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 183 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . showing by the Department that termination is in the child’s manifest best interest pursuant to section 39.810 . . . There are eleven manifest best interest factors to be considered under section 39.810, Florida Statutes . . .

N. B. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 183 So. 3d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . l)(i), Florida Statutes (2014); termination is in the manifest best interest of the children, see § 39.810 . . .

In A. W. S. W. N. W. v. Ad, 184 So. 3d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . So.3d 174, 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (holding that in order to terminate parental rights under section 39.810 . . .

S. M. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 190 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . and convincing-evidence; - 2) Termination is in the manifest best interest of the child under section 39.810 . . . convincing evidence, and that termination was in the manifest best interest of the children under section 39.810 . . .

W. L. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 172 So. 3d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The trial court’s final judgment includes findings required by section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2013 . . . relevant grounds listed in Florida Statute 39.806 and all of the factors set forth in Florida Statute 39.810 . . .

STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, v. A. A. A. S. A., 171 So. 3d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat. (2014); A.J. v. . . .

D. W. Q. M. E. Q. a v. A. B. M. E. Q. a, 200 So. 3d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . was facially insufficient because it did not consider the statutorily required factors under section 39.810 . . . order is facially insufficient for failing to include findings for the statutory factors in section 39.810 . . .

B. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 166 So. 3d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The court then reviewed the factors in section 39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes, regarding the manifest . . . See §§ 39.806, 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . In making this determination, section 39.810, Florida Statutes, sets forth a list of non-exclusive relevant . . .

C. D. T. R. T. R. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 164 So. 3d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 39.810(1), Florida Statutes, provides that “the availability of a ... placement with a relative . . .

D. S. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 164 So. 3d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The court also made findings on the factors required in section 39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes, including . . . Florida Statutes; (2) that termination is in the manifest best interest of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . . See §§ 39.802(4)(c), 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

STATE Ad v. T. S. A. B., 155 So. 3d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . with a relative” when assessing the least restrictive means, which is expressly prohibited by section 39.810 . . . Moreover, A.H. did not create an . exception to section 39.810(1) — trial courts still cannot consider . . .

In Z. C. Z. C. K. D. v. Ad Z. H. v. Ad, 132 So. 3d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . information before making a determination of the manifest best interests of each child under section 39.810 . . . original orders, the trial court had made findings on each of the eleven factors described in section 39.810 . . . When making an analysis under section 39.810, the trial court should reach its decision and state its . . .

J. E. Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 126 So. 3d 424 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . best interests of the child by evaluation of all relevant factors, including those set out in section 39.810 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, 101 So. 3d 368 (Fla. 2012)

. . . parental rights to be terminated for the following reasons: . allegations which correspond to sections 39.810 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad v. D. A. C. A. a, 90 So. 3d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .”); § 39.810(1), Fla. . . .

In Z. C. Z. C. Ad v. K. D. Z. H., 88 So. 3d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . met, and (2) that termination would be in the manifest best interests of the children under section 39.810 . . . Section 39.810 sets forth eleven non-exhaustive factors courts should consider in determining whether . . . of these factors is “[a]ny suitable permanent custody arrangement with a relative of the child.” § 39.810 . . . detailed findings regarding each of the eleven manifest best interest factors set forth in section 39.810 . . . court explained its rationale as follows: The Court therefore considered the provisions of sections 39.810 . . .

In N. R. G. a E. R. J. v. Ad, 86 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Department then asked the case manager whether each of the best interest factors as set forth in section 39.810 . . .

In N. F. a N. F. v. Ad, 82 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 39.810. . . . a litany of questions that simply parroted the manifest best interests factors set forth in section 39.810 . . . See § 39.810(2). . . . The case manager answered this and the other questions derived from section 39.810 with a simple “no. . . . they involved inquiries that basically parroted subsections (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) of section 39.810 . . .

In S. D. a S. B. v. Ad, 80 So. 3d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 39.806(1)(i), 39.810, Fla. . . .

D. M. B. A. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 79 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2010). A.M. has not demonstrated that this mandate was not followed. . . .

R. A. J. A. J. A. A. A. A. A. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 83 So. 3d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See §§ 39.802(4)(a), (c), 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

J. C. Ad v. K. K., 64 So. 3d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The court considered the factors in section 39.810, Florida Statutes, and made the following findings . . . Second, the court must consider under section 39.810 what is in the manifest best interest of the child . . . Section 39.810 further provides that “[f]or the purpose of determining the manifest best interests of . . . recommendations for the child provided by the child’s guardian ad litem or legal representative. § 39.810 . . .

L. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 62 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The factors are set forth under section 39.810, Florida Statutes. . . .

C. D. M. K. N. M. a v. K. N. R. Jr., 60 So. 3d 409 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . cannot conduct an appropriate appellate review because the statutory factors enumerated in section 39.810 . . . rights and remand for entry of an order containing the necessary findings of fact pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

In E. R. A. R. Ad v. S. H. F. R., 49 So. 3d 846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The trial court declined to reach the manifest best interests analysis required by section 39.810(1)- . . . the trial court stated it was not reaching the manifest best interest factors set forth in section 39.810 . . . See § 39.810 (providing that in a hearing on a TPR petition, “the court shall consider the manifest best . . . instance but must remand it for the trial court to fully consider all of the factors set forth in section 39.810 . . . court expressly failed to fully consider all of the manifest best interest factors set forth in section 39.810 . . .

A. B. E. M. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 47 So. 3d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . T.R., 987 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (explaining that under section 39.810(1), Florida Statutes, . . .

In T. M. a A. B. v., 40 So. 3d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2009), provides as follows, “In a hearing on a petition for termination . . . with directions that the trial court conduct further proceedings to consider each factor in section 39.810 . . .

K. W. J. T. T. A. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 36 So. 3d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . ) (“We nevertheless remand for reconsideration of A.C.’s best interests, in accordance with section 39.810 . . .

R. A. J. A. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 30 So. 3d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . requirement that termination must be in the manifest best interests of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

In E. C. a R. C. v. Ad M. C. v. Ad, 33 So. 3d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . under section 39.806 and that termination is in the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 . . . rights under section 39.806 and then consider the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 . . .

J. G. R. G. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 22 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . best interests of the child by evaluation of all relevant factors, including those set out in section 39.810 . . . rights was in the manifest best interest of the child, considering the factors set forth under section 39.810 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE- IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION ON DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS, 24 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2009)

. . . mother and father, and adding each specific finding that the court is required to make under section 39.810 . . . Under the provisions of sections 39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes, it is in the manifest best interests . . . Under the provisions of sections 39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes, it is in the manifest best interest . . .

J. S. L. A. a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Ad v. B. A. L. A. a, 18 So. 3d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . After addressing some of the “manifest best interests” factors enumerated in section 39.810, the trial . . . failing to address specifically each of the “manifest best interests” factors enumerated in section 39.810 . . . Section 39.810 does not expressly require a trial court to show its consideration of each of the statutory . . . Here, the trial court’s findings under section 39.810 are insufficient to facilitate meaningful appellate . . . This finding was relevant to factor (5) of section 39.810, which is “[t]he love, affection, and other . . .

H. D. v. J. L. D., 16 So. 3d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . We also have recognized that a circuit court considering the child’s best interests under section 39.810 . . .

In J. L. a W. L. v. Ad, 15 So. 3d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . the termination of the Father’s parental rights was in the son’s manifest best interest under section 39.810 . . . See § 39.810(3), (4). . . . . § 39.810(5). . . .

C. A. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 16 So. 3d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 39.810, Fla. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, v. P. E., 14 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 2009)

. . . (c) That the manifest best interests of the child, in accordance with s. 39.810, would be served by the . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. In C. W., 14 So. 3d 1041 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . trial court, directing the court to “again weigh all relevant factors, including those under section 39.810 . . . court entered a detailed order applying the facts of this case to the factors enumerated in section 39.810 . . . Nonetheless, the court concluded, after considering the factors enumerated in section 39.810, that “it . . .

D. H. J. R. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 12 So. 3d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The petition stated that Department would show, using the criteria set forth in section 39.810(1)-(11 . . .

In L. L- R. a J. R. v. Ad, 9 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 39.810. . . .

J. Y. n k a J. C. E. Y. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES Ad, 10 So. 3d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The trial court concluded, after evaluating the evidence in light of the factors in section 39.810, Florida . . .

In G. C. K. C. J. C. G. P. B. v. Ad, 6 So. 3d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . under section 39.806 and then must consider the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 . . .

R. E. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 996 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Addressing each of the factors listed in section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2008), the court found that . . .

In H. E. a P. E. v. Ad, 3 So. 3d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . (c) That the manifest best interests of the child, in accordance with s. 39.810, would be served by the . . .

C. C. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad, 994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat.; B.F. v. . . .

M. F. L. F. a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 992 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . interest of the child called for the termination of Appellant’s parental rights pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

In D. L. H. a T. L. v. Ad, 990 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . under section 39.806 and then must consider the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 . . .

M. M. L. H. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 987 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM v. T. R. C. W. C. W. C. W., 987 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2007), provides a non-exhaustive list of factors a trial court is to . . . the child and may not be considered as a factor weighing against termination of parental rights.” § 39.810 . . . best interests solely on the availability of a relative placement, in direct contravention of section 39.810 . . . On remand, the trial court shall again weigh all relevant factors, including those under section 39.810 . . .

M. B. T. S. T. S. W. S. T. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 976 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 39.810 of the Florida Statutes (2005), sets forth the various considerations involved when determining . . .

A. W. In B. W. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 969 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Tracking all the relevant factors set forth in section 39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes (2006), the Department . . .

K. W. S. S. J. W. J. W. D. W. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 959 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2006) provides that the court may consider a relative placement in . . .

T. O. O. H. a v. L. S., 954 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . , however, conduct appropriate appellate review because the statutory factors enumerated in section 39.810 . . .

L. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 957 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . mother, appeals from a final order terminating her parental rights pursuant to sections 39.806 and 39.810 . . .

V. J. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 949 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . parental rights is in the manifest best interests of the child, considering the factors listed in section 39.810 . . . Dep’t of Children & Families, 942 So.2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); see also § 39.810, Fla. . . .

C. M. A. A. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 953 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . over the child pursuant to sections 39.806(l)(b), 39.806(l)(d)l„ 39.806(l)(d)3., 39.806(l)(f), and 39.810 . . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2004), begins with the following language: 39.810 Manifest best interests . . . See § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . Department for subsequent adoption, was in the best interests of A.A., within the meaning of section 39.810 . . .

C. K. N. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES Ad, 942 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The evidence further supported the trial court’s determination under section 39.810 that it was in the . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE THREE YEAR CYCLE, 939 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2006)

. . . parental rights to be terminated for the following reasons: .allegations which correspond to sections 39.810 . . . Under the provisions of sections 39.806(1)B(11)39.810(1)-(11), Florida Statutes, it is in the manifest . . . We correct a typographical error in the proposed form 8.981 by deleting "39.806(1)B(11)” and adding "39.810 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, v. P. S. In C. S. G. S. M. S., 932 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . ; and to promote the health and well-being of all children under the state’s care”); § 39.001(3); § 39.810 . . .

W. R. E. R. R. R. A. R. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 928 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . to be considered in determining whether termination was in E.R.’s best interest pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

In J. B. a k a J. M. a J. R. v., 923 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Therefore, we find it unnecessary to discuss the trial court’s reasons under sections 39.810(1)-(11), . . .

In A. L. R. a T. V. R. v. C. R., 918 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . of A.L.R. and there was some testimony in this regard, but the court never made reference to section 39.810 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. K. F., 916 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . evidence that it was in the manifest best interests of the children pursuant to the factors under section 39.810 . . . best interests of the children to terminate KF.’s parental rights pursuant to the factors in section 39.810 . . . In this case, the trial court’s finding pursuant to section 39.810(3) that K.F. could have the capacity . . .

In D. A. D. II R. E. D. D. A. D. v., 903 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . SECTION 39.810 The Father contends that termination was not in the children’s manifest best interests . . . basis to disturb the trial court’s factual findings to the contrary or its other findings under section 39.810 . . .

I. R. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 904 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The Department is required to prove all the elements in section 39.810 to determine whether it is.in . . .

W. R. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 896 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The court must then consider the manifest best interests of the child, pursuant to section 39.810, Florida . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. P. K. N. K. D. K. S. S. D. P., 893 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The judge concluded that under section 39.810, it would not.be in the manifest best interest of the children . . . The court considered the eleven factors in section 39.810 and found they all supported termination, save . . .

In W. D. a W. D. v. Of, 891 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 39.810(1), Florida Statutes (2002), requires trial courts to evaluate, inter alia, “[a]ny suitable . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, v. M. J. K. J., 889 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2001), sets out eleven factors which the court is required to consider . . . the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference. § 39.810 . . .

In K. W. a S. S. v., 891 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . is currently living with a relative, the trial court failed to give proper consideration to section 39.810 . . .

J. J. M. P. M. H. Ad v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 886 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . it has as to each and every factor specifically enumerated in the Manifest Best Interest Statute, FS 39.810 . . . best interests of the child by evaluation of all relevant factors, including those set out in section 39.810 . . . the facts relevant to a determination of the manifest best interests of the children pursuant to F.S. 39.810 . . . requirement is "obsolete, unnecessary, and meaningless” because of the consideration under section 39.810 . . .

In J. A. A. A. H. P. v., 885 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Additionally, using the criteria in section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2003), the circuit court found . . . cannot overlook them in attempting to satisfy the child’s manifest best interests pursuant to section 39.810 . . . best interest analysis, but it is clear the court appropriately used the criteria found in section 39.810 . . .

B. C. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 887 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 2004)

. . . courts should take the loss of child support, present and future, into consideration under section 39.810 . . . Section 39.810(2), Florida Statutes (2003), provides: For the purpose of determining the manifest best . . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . See §§ 39.802(4)(c), 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . incarcerated parent’s rights when another parent retains custody, which is permitted under section 39.810 . . .

In E. D. B. N. A. N. R. N. L. N. v., 884 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . challenge the trial court’s findings regarding the children’s manifest best interests pursuant to section 39.810 . . . 39.806 and proof that termination is in the manifest best interests of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

C. B. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 879 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See §§ 39.810(1)-(11), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . Séction 39.810, Florida Statutes, provides various factors the trial court must consider when evaluating . . . (where the court suggests that section 39.810, Florida Statutes, “renders the less restrictive means . . . to establish, by clear and convincing evidence and considering the applicable provisions of section 39.810 . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. F. L., 880 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2004)

. . . the majority that section 39.806(0®; Florida Statutes, is constitutional, but I believe that section 39.810 . . . This is where section 39.810 comes in. . . . We decided Padgett before section 39.810 was enacted. . . . Section 39.810 now provides the filler. . . . Therefore, section 39.810 renders the less restrictive means test unnecessary. . . . In brief response to Justice Cantero’s specially concurring opinion, I agree that section 39.810 contains . . . See §§ 39.802(4)(c), 39.809(1), 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . . See §§ 39.802(4)(c), 39.809(1), 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

In D. D. R. D. Q. H. T. S. M. W. M. D. v., 879 So. 2d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The trial court also found, based on the eleven factors contained in section 39.810, that termination . . . section 39.806 and that termination is in the manifest best interests of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . . provide the necessary food, clothing, medical care, or other material needs of the children,” see § 39.810 . . . would be endangered if the children were returned to the custody of the biological parents,” see § 39.810 . . . and (4) “[t]here are limited emotional ties between the children and the biological mother,” see § 39.810 . . .

In K. A. K. A. K. A. K. A. v. S. A. v., 880 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2002). Again, the evidence at trial focused primarily upon the infant. . . . that Judge Sawaya has suggested that the "manifest best interests” considerations set forth in section 39.810 . . .

In E. I. F. a J. H. v., 872 So. 2d 924 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 39.810. . . .

M. H. O. O. S. B. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 866 So. 2d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

In L. B. W. a V. W. v., 863 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . (c) That the manifest best interests of the child, in accordance with s. 39.810, would be served by the . . . Section 39.810 requires that in “determining the manifest best interests of the child, the court shall . . . is whether there is “[a]ny suitable permanent custody arrangement with a relative of the child.” § 39.810 . . . section 39.806 and that termination is in the manifest best interests of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . . error here relates to its evaluation of the manifest best interests of the child pursuant to section 39.810 . . .

T. P. D. B. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 860 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . In my view, the provisions of section 39.810, Florida Statutes, make the creation of such a re-buttable . . . Failure to properly consider the manifest best interests of the child under section 39.810 constitutes . . . Section 39.810 requires the trial court to consider and evaluate all relevant factors in determining . . . Next, the trial court must consider under section 39.810(3), whether those same parents now have the . . . , particularly section 39.810(3). . . . RESTRICTIVE MEANS TEST STILL APPLICABLE IN TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS CASES IN LIGHT OF SECTION 39.810 . . .

C. C. A. C. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 851 So. 2d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . that, on remand, the trial court was to reconsider “A.C.’s best interests, in accordance with section 39.810 . . . Unfortunately, the trial court did not address, directly or indirectly, the factors outlined in section 39.810 . . . Because the trial court did not specifically address the factors set forth in section 39.810, it did . . . remanded to the trial court to consider, expressly and specifically, the factors outlined in section 39.810 . . .

A. A. R. J. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 852 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . • The Department noted that under section 39.810, Florida Statutes (2002), when considering the manifest . . . Statutes (2002) has been met and that “the manifest best interests of the child, in accordance with s. 39.810 . . . Section 39.810 provides that in a hearing on a TPR petition, “the court shall consider the manifest best . . . ground for termination of parental rights exists under section 39.806, the quoted language from section 39.810 . . .

In D. S. B. R. R. R. C. R. M. R. v., 849 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

K. O. T. L. O. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 843 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . termination order-findings of fact relating to the best interest of the child as required by section 39.810 . . .

P. O. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 840 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . §§ 39.809(1), 39.810, 39.811, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .