Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR R. v. FIRE SAFETY INVESTIGATION CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC LLC,, 915 F.3d 277 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Accordingly, his blended rate was $ 27.05 ($ 4,545 divided by 168 hours). . . . 771.84 In fact, he was paid $ 973.93, which represents his blended rate: 36 non-overtime hours x $ 27.05 . . . Again, we note that the $ 27.05 blended rate is rounded to the nearest cent, but all calculations were . . .

MONTANO, v. TEXAS,, 867 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . Code arts. 45.023(a)(3), 27.05. . . . Specifically, the district court concluded that Montano had failed to exhaust Articles 45.023 and 27.05 . . . Code arts, 45.023, 27.05. . . . jury, the defendant may: ... (3) enter the special plea of double jeopardy as described in Article 27.05 . . . Article 27.05 provides: A defendant’s only special plea is that he has already been prosecuted for the . . .

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. FHFA, 33 F. Supp. 3d 455 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . remaining principal balance) had an original LTV ratio of 80% or lower, and that 18.88% of the loans (and 27.05% . . . remaining principal balance) had an original LTV ratio of 80% or lower, and that 18.88% of the loans (and 27.05% . . . remaining principal balance) had an original LTV ratio of 80% or lower, and that 18.88% of the loans (and 27.05% . . .

UNITED STATES v. WRIGHT, Jr. a. k. a. C,, 513 F. App'x 839 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . Because Wright was, without objection, held responsible for at least 27.05 kilograms of cocaine base, . . .

In NOVATEL WIRELESS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 910 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . report, Novatel’s stock price increased from the $25.09 per share intraday low to a closing price of $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 912 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D.N.M. 2012)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007, and paid $27.05 per share. See CACAC ¶ 56, at 25. . . . with Thornburg Mortgage’s: (1) May 4, 2007, public offering of 4.5. million shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1097 (D.N.M. 2012)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007, and paid $27.05 per share. See CCAC ¶ 56, at 25. . . . Thorn-burg Mortgage’s: (1) May 4, 2007, public offering of 4.5. million shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

In BP P. L. C. SECURITIES LITIGATION. In BP p. l. c., 866 F. Supp. 2d 709 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . days after the end of the Class Period, BP ADS prices reached an intraday low of $26.75, closing at $27.05 . . . Four days after the last day of the Class Period, BP ADSs closed at $27.05, representing a decline of . . .

In NOVATEL WIRELESS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 830 F. Supp. 2d 996 (S.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . that Plaintiffs argue the news about the “end of life” of the U720 hit the market, Novatel closed at $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 824 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D.N.M. 2011)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007 and paid $27.05 per share. See CCAC ¶ 54, at 16. . . . arise out of four events: (i) the May 4, 2007 public offering of 4,500,000 shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 265 F.R.D. 571 (D.N.M. 2010)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007 and paid $27.05 per share. See id. . . . four stock offerings: (i) the May 4, 2007 public offering of 4,500,-000 shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D.N.M. 2010)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007 and paid $27.05 per share. See id. . . . of four stock offerings: (i) the May 4, 2007 public offering of 4,500,000 shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

In THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 695 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D.N.M. 2010)

. . . She bought them on May 4, 2007 and paid $27.05 per share. See id. . . . arise out of four events: (i) the May 4, 2007 public offering of 4,500,000 shares of common stock at $27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRAJEDA,, 581 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . commit a battery” (citation omitted)); see generally Joshua Dressier, Understanding Criminal Law § 27.05 . . .

BACKE, v. NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC. V. B. M. S. F., 642 F. Supp. 2d 1169 (S.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . Novatel stock opened at $28.31, which was the high for the day, reached a low of $25.09, and closed at $27.05 . . .

BACKE, v. NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC. V. B. M. S. F., 607 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (S.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . Novatel stock opened at $28.31, which was the high for the day, reached a low of $25.09, and closed at $27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES LULAC- GI v. TEXAS,, 572 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Port Arthur ISD reported 506 denials, a 43.55% rate of denial; Plainview ISD reported 162 denials, a 27.05% . . .

AGREDANO, v. UNITED STATES,, 82 Fed. Cl. 416 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . Marilao noted that 27.05 kilograms of marijuana was found in the gas tank of the Pathfinder that was . . . A TOTAL OF 40 PACKAGES THAT WEIGHED 27.05 KGS WERE REMOVED FROM THE GAS TANK. . . . which were sealed in vacuum seal bags with duct tape, cellophane wrap, and packing tape and weighed 27.05 . . .

C. BARNES, v. STATE, 743 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . At the same time, section 27.05 requires only that the State Attorney “shall assist the Attorney General . . . By its plain terms, section 27.05 pertains only to the supreme court and even then it merely requires . . .

C. TOBIN, v. HAVERFORD SCHOOL,, 936 F. Supp. 284 (E.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . 50% x 37.5 hours billed total hours: rate: lodestar: 20% reduction: award: on reply to def.’s opp’n) 27.05 . . .

ACCU PERSONNEL, INC. v. ACCUSTAFF, INC., 846 F. Supp. 1191 (D. Del. 1994)

. . . statutory change "codified the nearly unanimous rule of the cases" interpreting that section. 2 McCarthy § 27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. ARMSTRONG, UNITED STATES v. L. KUHN, UNITED STATES v. L. KUHN,, 16 F.3d 289 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . Armstrong argued the bill was real as he was arrested with $27.05 in genuine currency, twenty dollars . . .

CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS. CO. v. GRODSKY SERVICE, INC. t a S. Co. v. SVA, INC. v. METRAFLEX CO. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS. CO. v. SVA, INC. v. METRAFLEX CO., 781 F. Supp. 897 (D. Conn. 1991)

. . . . ¶¶ 27.02[2][d][i], 27.05-27.05[1] (collecting cases). . . .

In GOLD SEAL PRODUCTS CO. INC. H. L. RABURN CO., 128 B.R. 822 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . which subtracted from 137.5 hours claimed as expended for review leaves an excess time for review of 27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ORTIZ,, 883 F.2d 515 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 27.05 (1977). . . .

BOYD MOTORS, INC. v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU,, 880 F.2d 270 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . damage occurred); accord generally Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice, Vol. 6, § 3883 at 373-77 and n. 27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESPARZA,, 876 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 27.05 (1977). . . . .

H. ABRAMS, v. M. FEINBLATT,, 80 B.R. 358 (D. Md. 1987)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy Paragraph 27.05, at 1096 (14th Ed.1978). . . .

E. OLTZ, v. ST. PETER S COMMUNITY HOSPITAL,, 656 F. Supp. 760 (D. Mont. 1987)

. . . See Devitt and Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 27.05. . . .

KINOSHITA v. CANADIAN PACIFIC AIRLINES, LIMITED,, 803 F.2d 471 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . The decision in such cases to be reached within ten (10) calendar days from the date of suspension. 27.05 . . .

In BALDWIN- UNITED CORPORATION, D. H., 52 B.R. 549 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1985)

. . . The option prices provided by the Plan ($13.82 to $43.92 per share, or an average of $27.05 (Ex. 3)) . . .

BAKER, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 711 F.2d 44 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . App.1971); Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotated art. 27.05 (West Supp.1983). . . .

BOULDIS, v. U. S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORP., 711 F.2d 1319 (6th Cir. 1983)

. . . See 16C Von Kalinowski, supra, at § 27.05; Annotation, “Validity, construction, and application of §§ . . . 84r-85 (N.D.I11.1966), aff’d per curiam, 371 F.2d 428 (7th Cir.1966); 16C Von Kalinowski, supra, at § 27.05 . . .

ROBINSON, v. WADE,, 686 F.2d 298 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . Special Plea are determined in the course of the trial on the merits, see Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. arts. 27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITLEY,, 670 F.2d 617 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . See Devitt and Blackmar § 27.05 (3d ed. 1977). . . .

In WALSH CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNITED STATES v. ALASKA NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH In WALSH, d b a UNITED STATES v. ALASKA NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH, 669 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . Blair (In re Blair), 538 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir. 1976) (per curiam); 2A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 27.05 . . .

In WALSH CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNITED STATES v. ALASKA NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH In WALSH, d b a UNITED STATES v. ALASKA NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH, 669 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . Blair (In re Blair), 538 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir. 1976) (per curiam); 2A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 27.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEWMAN,, 664 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Fox, Business Organizations, Corporate Acquisitions and Mergers, § 27.05[4] (1981). . . .

BAKER v. METCALFE,, 633 F.2d 1198 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . See Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. arts. 27.05 & 27.07 (Vernon 1976 & Supp.1980). . . .

In A. ERICSON, In A. ERICSON, In ERICSON DEVELOPMENT CO. INC. G. LANDS, M. D. v. A. ERICSON, A. Co., 6 B.R. 1002 (D. Minn. 1980)

. . . be reversed by the court of appeals unless discretion has been abused. 2A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 27.05 . . .

H. CARTER, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 499 F. Supp. 777 (S.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . Although he filed a “Special Plea” in the district court, pursuant to Tex.Crim.Pro.Code Ann. art. 27.05 . . . petitioner Carter filed a “Special Plea” with the trial court, pursuant to Tex.Crim.Proc.Code Ann. art. 27.05 . . . Texas law, the respondent says, requires that a special plea submitted pursuant to Article 27.05 be filed . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. RIOS,, 611 F.2d 1335 (10th Cir. 1979)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions §§ 27.05 (3d ed. 1977). . 585 F.2d at 965. . . .

STATE L. SHEVIN, E. v. T. WEINSTEIN, H., 353 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . 4, 1977 and is hereby authorized and directed under the authority of Chapter 27.02 F.S. and Chapter 27.05 . . . Sections 27.01, 27.05, 27.16, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

S. OCHOA v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 445 F. Supp. 1076 (W.D. Tex. 1976)

. . . Art. 27.05 (Acts 1965 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722 Amended Acts 1973 63rd Leg., p. 968 ch. 399 . . .

G. ALVAREZ, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 531 F.2d 1319 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . jeopardy clause because he failed to timely file a written plea of double jeopardy as required by Article 27.05 . . . Article 27.05, V.A.C.C.P. We disagree. . . .

In EQUITY FUNDING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a BACHE CO. INCORPORATED v. M. LOEFFLER,, 519 F.2d 1274 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . Mau-ghan, 419 F.2d 1152, 1155 (9th Cir. 1969); 2A Collier on Bankruptcy K 27.05 at 1094-1095 (14th Ed . . .

BAXTER, v. SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINING CORPORATION,, 495 F.2d 437 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . Black employees in segregated job classifications in 1971 earned $27.05 less on the average than Whites . . .

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER,, 376 F. Supp. 1099 (S.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.05, at 571-76 (1958) [hereinafter cited as Davis] ; cf. . . .

NEGRON, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 282 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . We are informed that Insurance Department Regulation 4 — 27.05, subsection 1(2), interprets the statute . . .

In KEN BOATMAN, INC. d b a, 359 F. Supp. 1062 (W.D. La. 1973)

. . . Referee’s decision will not be set aside unless there is plain error or abuse of discretion. 2 Collier § 27.05 . . .

BAXTER, v. SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINING CORPORATION,, 350 F. Supp. 139 (S.D. Ga. 1972)

. . . Black employees in segregated job classifications in 1971 earned $27.05 less on the average than Whites . . .

In SAPPHIRE STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., 339 F. Supp. 119 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)

. . . except where there is a plain error or abuse of discretion.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., fí 27.05 . . .

KNOX HILL TENANT COUNCIL v. E. WASHINGTON,, 448 F.2d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . Davis, supra note 1, § 27.05, at 571-576 (1958) ; Cramton, supra note 1, at 401-404; Scalia, supra note . . .

In MEDICAL STERILE PRODUCTS,, 310 F. Supp. 262 (D.P.R. 1970)

. . . Moss, 62 F.2d 37, 39-40 (4 Cir.1932); 2 Colliers on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Sections 27.03 to 27.05 . . .

In IRA HAUPT CO. a, 252 F. Supp. 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)

. . . . ¶27.05. . . .

FLORIDA TRAILER AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, v. R. DEAL, d b a, 284 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1960)

. . . not be set aside except where there is a plain error or abuse of discretion.” 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 27.05 . . .

R. ENGLAND v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, 263 F.2d 661 (5th Cir. 1959)

. . . 30-1 to 5-30-17, Gen.Laws 1956; South Carolina: Secs. 56-351 to 56-361, Code 1952; South Dakota: Ch. 27.05 . . .

CONNECTICUT RY. LIGHTING CO. v. NEW YORK, N. H. H. R. CO., 190 F.2d 305 (2d Cir. 1951)

. . . Todd, 282 U.S. 881, 51 S.Ct. 85, 75 L.Ed. 777; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th ed., Par. 27.05. . . .

In TRUSCOTT BOAT DOCK CO., 92 F. Supp. 430 (W.D. Mich. 1950)

. . . Supp. 952; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., § 27.05. . . .

C. A. v., 10 T.C. 273 (T.C. 1948)

. . . He had another short term capital gain of $27.05. . . .

ERNST, 2 F.R.D. 447 (S.D. Cal. 1942)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice Under the New Federal Rules, page 2526, sec. 27.05 — 3. . . .

THE CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 28 Ct. Cl. 427 (Ct. Cl. 1893)

. . . Amador Branch Railroad Company. 27.05 8. Berkeley Branch Railroad Company. 3.83 9. . . .

THE CENTEAL PACIFIC RAILEOAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 24 Ct. Cl. 145 (Ct. Cl. 1889)

. . . Amador Branch Railroad Company. 27.05 8. Berkeley Bran eh Railroad Company.. 3.83 9. . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)