The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 20
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 20.106

20.106 Land Acquisition Trust Fund within Department of State.—

(1) The Land Acquisition Trust Fund is created within the Department of State. The trust fund is established for use as a depository for funds received from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund within the Department of Environmental Protection and for expenditure of such funds for the purposes set forth in s. 28, Art. X of the State Constitution.

(2) The Department of State must maintain the integrity of such moneys transferred from the Department of Environmental Protection. Any transferred moneys available from reversions or reductions in budget authority shall be transferred back to the Land Acquisition Trust Fund within the Department of Environmental Protection within 15 days after such reversion or reduction and shall be available for future appropriation for the purposes set forth in s. 28, Art. X of the State Constitution.

(3) If expenditures from the trust fund will result in state ownership of land or related property interests, title shall be vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund as required under chapter 253. Such acquisition of land or related property interests shall be by voluntary, negotiated acquisition and, if title is to be vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, is subject to the acquisition procedures of s. 253.025. Acquisition costs include purchase prices and costs and fees associated with title work, surveys, and appraisals required to complete an acquisition. The Department of State or its designee shall manage such lands or related property interests in accordance with the purposes set forth in s. 28, Art. X of the State Constitution. Other uses, not contrary to such purposes, may be authorized.

(4) Moneys in the trust fund may not be invested as provided in s. 17.61, but shall be retained in the trust fund for investment with interest appropriated to the General Revenue Fund as provided in s. 17.57.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2015-231; s. 2, ch. 2018-113.

F.S. 20.106 on Google Scholar

F.S. 20.106 on Casetext

Amendments to 20.106

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 20.106

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 20.106.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCMUNN, D. J. v. BABCOCK WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. B W B W, 869 F.3d 246 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 20.106”— “not some other regulation, license requirement or other issue.” . . . We agree with the District Court' that Defendants’ duty was defined by § 20.106. . . . First, Plaintiffs argue that any emission from the roof counts under § 20.106. . . . and because we owe Auer deference to the NRC’s interpretation of § 20.106. . . . “at the boundary of the restricted area.” 10 C.F.R. § 20.106(d). . . . .§ 20.106(a) requires averaging as opposed to merely allowing Plaintiffs to average exposure over a year . . .

McMUNN, v. BABCOCK WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. v. P. v. W. v. v. v. v. L. v. v. L. D. v. v. v. v. v. S. v., 131 F. Supp. 3d 352 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . See, e.g., 10 C.F.R. § 20.106(a) (1967). . . . . § 20.106 at the Apollo facility’s boundaries. On April 20, 1964, E.V. . . . , with the result that releases may have exceeded § 20.106 in the community,. . . . Ex. 6) (publishing 10 C.F.R, § 20.106(b)). . . . Since 1991, 10 C.F.R. §§ 20.105 and 20.106 no longer exist. . . .

GOOD, v. FLUOR DANIEL CORPORATION, v., 222 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (E.D. Wash. 2002)

. . . . § 20.105 and 20.106, which were in effect when the Three Mile Island accident occurred in 1979, not . . . Section 20.106 required that “[a] licensee shall not possess, use, or transfer licensed material so as . . . exceed the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of this part, except as authorized ....” 10 C.F.R. § 20.106 . . . Radiation, 56 Fed.Reg. 23360 (May 21, 1991) (codified at 10 C.F.R. § 20 (2002)). 10 C.F.R. § 20.105 and 20.106 . . .

In TMI LITIGATION No. In TMI No. In TMI No., 193 F.3d 613 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 20.105, 20.106 (1979). These regulations were in effect at the time of the TMI accident. . . .

F. HALL v. BABCOCK WILCOX COMPANY,, 69 F. Supp. 2d 716 (W.D. Pa. 1999)

. . . . § 20.106. . . . . § 20.106. . . . He did however, see sufficient data to enable him to opine that § 20.106 was violated. . . . and claimed injuries only from violation of § 20.106. . . . In every instance a Plaintiff must prove a violation of § 20.106. . . .

McCAFFERTY, v. CENTERIOR SERVICE COMPANY,, 983 F. Supp. 715 (N.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . . § 20.105 and 20.106, and not ALARA, constitute the standard of care to be applied in these actions. . . . allegations do not state a PLA claim and would be deemed a pendent state claim. . 10 C.F.R. §§ 20.105 and 20.106 . . .

CORCORAN, v. NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY CORCORAN, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., 935 F. Supp. 376 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . . §§ 20.105 and 20.106 — provided the standard of care, I find the reasoning underlying that opinion . . .

McLANDRICH, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY,, 942 F. Supp. 457 (S.D. Cal. 1996)

. . . Sections 20.105 and 20.106, on the other hand, set out the radiation dose limits for individuals in “ . . .

In TMI LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED PROCEEDINGS., 927 F. Supp. 834 (M.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . .] §§ 20.105 or 20.106, as measured at the boundary of the facility, not whether each plaintiff was exposed . . . must show that: 1) defendants released radiation into the environment in excess of the §§ 20.105 or 20.106 . . . The lowest level prohibited by sections 20.105 and 20.106 is 0.5 rems (500 mrem). . . . Woodard describes MPC as follows: Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 20.106 (10 CFR 20 . . . Section 20.106 states that a licensee "shall not possess, use, or transfer licensed material so as to . . .

In TMI LITIGATION CASES CONSOLIDATED II., 911 F. Supp. 775 (M.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . In re TMI, 67 F.3d at 1118 (“Defendants conceded that they violated § 20.106, [therefore we find] they . . .

In TMI. Co. Co. UE C, 67 F.3d 1103 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 20.105 and 20.106, and not ALARA, constitute the standard of care to be applied in these actions . . . While § 20.105 defines the levels of radiation permitted in unrestricted areas, § 20.106 defines the . . . Defendants admit that the radiation levels at the boundary of the TMI facility exceeded the § 20.106 . . . Four years later, in 1964, the AEC amended § 20.106 (and the Appendix B levels to which § 20.106 refers . . . See 10 C.F.R. §§ 20.105, 20.106 (1979). . . .

In TMI LITIGATION CASES CONSOLIDATED II, 904 F. Supp. 379 (M.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . . §§ 20.106, the permissible radioactive effluent emissions in unrestricted areas. . . . A second regulatory section addresses emission levels; 10 C.F.R. § 20.106 provides: (a) A licensee shall . . . Third, § 20.106 counsels that emissions in excess of the listed amounts expose the nuclear facility to . . . Moreover, if Plaintiffs can prove that Defendants’ emissions exceeded those levels set out in § 20.106 . . . (a) The standard of care in the captioned action is that set forth in §§ 20.105 and 20.106. . . .

CRAWFORD, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY,, 784 F. Supp. 439 (S.D. Ohio 1989)

. . . . § 20.106 and App. B, Table II; see Train v. Colorado Pub. . . . See 10 C.F.R. 20.106 and App. B, Table II. . . .

TELEVISION ENTERPRISE NETWORK, INC. a v. ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK, INC. a, 630 F. Supp. 244 (D.N.J. 1986)

. . . Callman, § 20.106, at 22 (actual confusion “highly probative” of likelihood of confusion). . . .

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION v. RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., 519 F. Supp. 1266 (D.N.J. 1981)

. . . . § 20.106. . . . . § 20.106 indicates that: (a) A licensee shall not possess, use, or transfer licensed material so as . . . conduit may be determined with respect to the point where the material leaves the conduit. 10 C.F.R. § 20.106 . . . The periodic pool surveys do not provide the data applicable to 10 C.F.R. § 20.106(d). . . .

M. SILKWOOD, G. v. KERR- McGEE CORPORATION, 485 F. Supp. 566 (W.D. Okla. 1979)

. . . . §§ 20.105(b), 20.106(a) (1974). . . .

TRAIN, ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. COLORADO PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, INC., 426 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1976)

. . . releases of source, byproduct, and special nuclear materials into the environment by licensees. 10 CFR § 20.106 . . .

UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, v. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, 499 F.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 20.106 and Appendix B specify maximum allowable concentrations of radioactive materials. . . . provides that each operating license must include technical specifications requiring compliance with § 20.106 . . . annual releases of radioactive material in effluents at small percentages of the limits specified in § 20.106 . . . may temporarily result in releases higher than [the small percentages of the limits specified in § 20.106 . . . that would occur under normal operating conditions] but still within the limits specified in § 20.106 . . .