Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Time Bar to Cash Payments...341 19.10 Distributions After Effective Date...341 19.11 Setoffs...341 19.12 . . . in this Section 19.11 shall affect the releases and injunctions provided in Article XXX of the Plan. 19.12 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Time Bar to Cash Payments...304 19.10 Distributions After Effective Date...304 19.11 Setoffs...304 19.12 . . . in this Section 19.11 shall affect the releases and injunctions provided in Article XXX of the Plan. 19.12 . . .

TURNER, v. BFI WASTE SERVICES, LLC d b a LLC d b a, 268 F. Supp. 3d 831 (D.S.C. 2017)

. . . Turner's April 21, 2014 raise described an increase in Turner’s pay rate from "$18.12 per hour” to “$19.12 . . .

DOE, v. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY,, 177 F. Supp. 3d 561 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . (Id, § 19.12). . . .

KOSTICK, P. S. J. v. T. NAGO, IV, Y. S. E., 878 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (D. Haw. 2012)

. . . disaggregation method referred to above, the following proportions were used: One person was extracted per 19.12 . . .

SHRADER, v. Al BIDDINGER, 633 F.3d 1235 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . Nimmer, Law of Computer Technology § 19.12 (Updated Sept. 2010) (discussing Calder's adaptation to internet . . .

L. ROBERSON, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 401 F. App'x 542 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 19.12, do not prevent the same Board member from conducting a hearing and also deciding an appeal . . .

L. ROBERSON, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 401 F. App'x 542 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 19.12, do not prevent the same Board member from conducting a hearing and also deciding an appeal . . .

MITUTOYO CORPORATION, AB, v. CENTRAL PURCHASING, LLC,, 499 F.3d 1284 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . calipers retailed from $40.00 to $397.00 and have advanced functionality, Central’s calipers sold from $19.12 . . .

BRADLEY, v. CITY OF LYNN,, 443 F. Supp. 2d 145 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . Rate Rate__Rates_Rate Ratio of Hispanic and Non-protected Group Passing Rates 90 52.47% 17.69% 3.71% 19.12% . . .

WALBURN, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, 431 F.3d 966 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . altering Plaintiffs radiation records and medical records, had violated 10 CFR Part 19 and specifically § 19.12 . . .

CASHMAN v. CITY OF COTATI, a, 374 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . Ordinance No. 680 in anticipation of the repeal of its then-governing rent control ordinance, Chapter 19.12 . . .

THO DINH TRAN, v. ALPHONSE HOTEL CORP. d b a d b a, 281 F.3d 23 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . paid to a paper hanger/sign painter, which would result in an overtime rate of between $18.12 and $19.12 . . . amendment to the CBA provided for a 5.5% wage increase for all workers on August 1, 1990, resulting in a $19.12 . . . 1989 $18.12 x 51 x 52 = 48,054.24 1/1/90 to 7/31/90 $18.12 X 51 x 30 = 27,723.60 8/1/90 to 12/31/90 $19.12 . . . x 51 x 22 = 21,452.64 1/1/91 to 7/4/91 $19.12 x 23 x 26 = 11,433.76 Total Overtime: = 108,664.24 . . . .

v., 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 851 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2000)

. . . . § 19.12(f)(2), which provides that “FIFO inventory procedures may be used only for fungible merchandise . . .

AMMEX, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 116 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2000)

. . . . § 19.12(f)(2), which provides that “FIFO inventory procedures may be used only for fungible merchandise . . .

SIMS, v. BOEING CO., 60 F. Supp. 2d 1220 (D. Kan. 1999)

. . . Section 19.12 Conferences During Working Hours. . . .

R. SWANSON, v. D. WEST, Jr., 12 Vet. App. 442 (Vet. App. 1999)

. . . . § 19.12(a) (1998) (“Member of the Board will disqualify himself or herself in a hearing or decision . . .

WEBSTER, v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA,, 51 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999)

. . . Table 1 in the 1994 Post-Disparity Study shows minority utilization of 13.50% in 1990, 24.03% in 1991, 19.12% . . .

VIRGINIA METRONET, INC. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA,, 984 F. Supp. 966 (E.D. Va. 1998)

. . . D.A at 19.12. . . . D.A. at 19.12. In contrast, the Grissom property is zoned A-l, General Agricultural District. . . . D.A. at 19.12, 13. . . .

HEIDE, v. HUNTER HAMILTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, St. J. D. H. II,, 826 F. Supp. 224 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . . § 19.12) provided in relevant part: “if it shall appear that a greater rate of interest has been, directly . . .

In BENDE, PLURAL REALTY INC. In- F. S. B. v. BENDE,, 152 B.R. 677 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . a portion of the sewer line intended to connect FAIRWAY PLAZA to the city sewer system through Lots 19.12 . . .

In BONDI S VALU- KING, INC. UNITED STATES v. O. SIMON,, 126 B.R. 47 (N.D. Ohio 1991)

. . . . §§ 636(b)(1) and (3), and Local Civ.R. 19.05-19.12. . . .

PYRAMID SECURITIES LIMITED, v. IB RESOLUTION, INC., 924 F.2d 1114 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 19.12, at 19-216 & n. 20 (2d ed. 1985), and, more specifically, that . . .

K. HAMMON, v. S. BARRY, Jr. BYRNE, v. R. COLEMAN,, 752 F. Supp. 1087 (D.D.C. 1990)

. . . hired by the fire Dapartnant will receive the followlngi $100 per month for each month between July 1, 19.12 . . .

In WOLOSCHAK FARMS, UNITED STATES v. WOLOSCHAK FARMS,, 109 B.R. 736 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1989)

. . . . § 636(b)(1), (3), and L.Civ.R. 19.05-19.12, this Court referred the matter to a magistrate for a report . . .

PORT SIDE TRANSPORT, INC. v. VAN HUFFEL TUBE CORPORATION,, 127 B.R. 165 (N.D. Ohio 1989)

. . . . § 636(b)(1), (3), and L.Civ.R. 19.05-19.12, this Court referred the matter to a magistrate for a report . . .

HOLT HAULING AND WAREHOUSING SYSTEM, INC. v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE, J. L., 650 F. Supp. 1013 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . . § 19.12(a)(2). . . . These are violations of 19 C.F.R. § 19.12(b)(6) which provides: (b) Security and storage. . . .

v. U. S. J. L., 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 769 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1986)

. . . . § 19.12(a)(2). . . . These are violations of 19 C.F.R. § 19.12(b)(6) which provides: (b) Security and storage. . . .

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. v. DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,, 479 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1986)

. . . III); 19 CFR §§ 19.1-19.12 (1986). . . . manner in which goods enter and leave the warehouse, § 19.6, the records the proprietor must keep, §19.12 . . . Under § 19.12(b)(3), to maintain the security of the merchandise a warehouse proprietor is to comply . . .

ROSE, v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 800 F.2d 563 (6th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 19.12 (mandating health and safety instructions to employees), 10 C.F.R. § 19.13 (requiring that . . .

LARIMORE, M. G. v. COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY,, 789 F.2d 1244 (7th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 19.12-19.14 (1985), providing that after the hearing has been conducted and the finding of facts . . .

v., 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 145 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . . § 19.12 (1983), pertaining to proper recordkeeping. . . . . § 19.12(b)(5). . . .

SILKWOOD, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SILKWOOD v. KERR- McGEE CORP., 464 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1984)

. . . See, e. g., 10 CFR § 19.12 (1974) (requiring education of workers concerning hazards of radiation); § . . .

A. WILSON, A. Jr. R. W. III A. W. D. E. C. L. J. G. E. v. ROBINSON,, 668 F.2d 380 (8th Cir. 1981)

. . . No. 255, §§ 7.1,19.1, 19.2, 19.10 & 19.12 (1978). . . .

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION v. RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., 519 F. Supp. 1266 (D.N.J. 1981)

. . . . § 19.12 provides: All individuals working in or frequenting any portion of a restricted area shall . . . evident from the record before the court, including RTFs own admissions, that RTI violated 10 C.F.R. § 19.12 . . . Therefore, RTI violated 10 C.F.R. § 19.12 by failing to instruct its employees where to wear the badge . . . Furthermore, as a technical point, RTI argues that the film badge requirement is contained in 10 C.F.R. § 19.12 . . . personnel monitoring devices, /. e., film badges, is contained in 10 C.F.R. § 20.202, not 10 C.F.R. § 19.12 . . .

ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, a v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, a, 361 F. Supp. 1032 (D.N.J. 1973)

. . . procedures for the administration of Rh immune globulin may differ widely (e. g., Judelsohn J-37 p. 19.12 . . .

LITTLE RIVER INVESTMENTS, INC. a v. C. FOWLER, 266 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . American Law of Zoning, Anderson, §§ 413, 414; Vol. 3, American Law of Zoning, Anderson, §§ 19.10, 19.12 . . .

KING, Jr. v. KINGS COUNTY LAFAYETTE TRUST COMPANY, M. E. C. H. Jr., 323 F. Supp. 640 (E.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . See 3a Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 19.12. . . .

v., 57 Cust. Ct. 687 (Cust. Ct. 1966)

. . . prices is as follows: i-3 fcT c+- & CD O O CD e oV tr-et- Included ocean freight ^-1 *■=} ® ^ $10.52 ID 19.12 . . . said values are: Chair No. 5 $114.00 each less ocean freight of $10.52 “ No. 560 $162.00 “ “ “ “ “ $19.12 . . .

J. T. Co. v., 55 Cust. Ct. 562 (Cust. Ct. 1965)

. . . $19.11 R64-10177 23524 $3,598.46 $35.58 R64-10177 23524 $3,793.85 $18.97 R64-10179 24555 $5,735.34 $19.12 . . .

E. D. D. v., 43 T.C. 667 (T.C. 1965)

. . . affixed to real estate over the holder of a mortgage on the realty. 5 American Law of Property, sec. 19.12 . . . mortgagor are subordinated to those of the real estate mortgagor. 5 American Law of Property, sec. 19.12 . . .

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. a a v. WINCKLER SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. a, 284 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1960)

. . . namely, $14.29 actually paid by Tree-Sweet plus $10.81 for the oil and peel, or a price which was $19.12 . . .

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, v. YTURBIDE, REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, v. MARTIN, REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, v. MARTIN,, 258 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1958)

. . . The latter say, (§ 19.12): “Defendant in a res ipsa case may show by evidence how the accident happened . . .

SIMON v. SCHAETZEL. In SIMON, 189 F.2d 597 (10th Cir. 1951)

. . . On July 25, 1947, the wife endorsed and cashed a $25.00 bond for $19.12 at a bank in California, where . . .

UNITED STATES v. YATES, 58 F.2d 368 (E.D. Va. 1932)

. . . It further appears that Commander Yates filed claim with the Auditor for $19.12-for additional pay from . . .

In FAHNESTOCK MFG. CO., 7 F.2d 777 (W.D. Pa. 1925)

. . . Fahnestock May 21, 19.12, and have been depreciated from July 29, 1915, on the basis of their remaining . . .

UNITED STATES v. ET AL., 253 U.S. 195 (U.S. 1920)

. . . appropriated for (Acts of July 31, 1894, 28 Stat. 162, 204; March 2, 1895, 28 Stat. 764, 806; August 24, 19.12 . . .

UNION DRY GOODS COMPANY v. GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION, 248 U.S. 372 (U.S. 1919)

. . . claims pressed in argument, we need notice only two: That the obligation of the contract of July 18,- 19.12 . . .

HUNNEWELL v. GILL, 257 F. 857 (D. Mass. 1918)

. . . Act July 27, 19.12, authorizing presentation of claims for refunding inheritance taxes illegally collected . . .

GUERINI STONE CO. v. P. J. CARLIN CONSTRUCTION CO., 240 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1916)

. . . and the first month of the' following year, and that his successor, who took charge on February 1, 19.12 . . .

NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 220 F. 108 (9th Cir. 1915)

. . . employés thereafter remained on duty as such conductor and trainmen until 10:30 p. m. on said January 10, 19.12 . . .

In GOLDSTEIN BENJAMIN v. CENTRAL TRUST CO., 216 F. 887 (7th Cir. 1914)

. . . On December 30, 19.12, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against Goldstein and Moseson. . . .

ARIZONA N. M. RY. CO. v. CLARK, 207 F. 817 (9th Cir. 1913)

. . . hazardous service, and providing remedies therefor,” approved June 8, 1912 (Session Daws of Arizona 19.12 . . .

MECHANICS METALS NAT. BANK v. HOWELL, 207 F. 973 (D. Conn. 1913)

. . . report an "approximate statement of assets and liabilities of the McGrum-Howen Company as of March 14, 19.12 . . . the corporation was insolvent and that investigation by the receivers since their report of April 21, 19.12 . . .

In PODOLIN, 205 F. 563 (E.D. Pa. 1913)

. . . An adjudication in bankruptcy was made on the 28th day of June, 19.12, and the bankrupts declined to . . .

In ZITRON, 203 F. 79 (E.D. Wis. 1913)

. . . On January 12, 1912, all the property was destroyed by fire, and on February 3, 19.12, Zitron made a . . .

In DOUBLE STAR BRICK CO., 210 F. 980 (N.D. Cal. 1913)

. . . The order was entered January 23, 19.12, in an involuntary proceeding, after written admission of insolvency . . .

RUSSELL v. GIRARD TRUST CO., 171 F. 161 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1909)

. . . applied to the payment of the debt until it becomes due, and some o£ it does not mature until the years 19.12 . . .

THE THOMAS MORGAN, 123 F. 781 (D.S.C. 1903)

. . . their liens for supplies under the state statute, including therein the claim of Thomas Duggan for $19.12 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)