The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Doc. 22 at p. 4 (citing Plan § 11.12). . . .
. . . . §§ 11.3-11.12; 614.4-614.16. . . .
. . . or Lascivious Offenses Committed Upon or in the Presence of an Elderly Person or Disabled Person), 11.12 . . . Instructions 11.10, 11.11, 11.12, and 29.13(c) are authorized for publication and use as modified. . . . With regard to instruction 11.12, the table of lesser-included offenses is modified from the Committee's . . . adopted in 2007 [965 So.2d 811] and amended in 2010 [48 So.3d 41], and 2015 [163 So.3d 478], and 2018. 11.12 . . .
. . . (See Credit Agreement §§ 11.10, 11.12.) . . .
. . . sought to have the stay lifted, and to withdraw instructions 11.7, 11.10, 11.10(a)-11.10(g), 11.11, 11.12 . . .
. . . Section 11.12 of the Agreement provides: Additional Remedies. . . .
. . . MTO”) to determine whether to operate the engine, the electric motor, or both. ’634 patent, col. 3, 11.12 . . . -21; id. col. 13, 11.12-29, 44-65; id. col. 41, 1. 4, through col. 43, 1. 25 & Fig. 9. . . .
. . . The ’816 and ’390 patents similarly recite the use of a “processor” and “memory.” ’816 patent col. 25 11.12 . . .
. . . that they “protrude up to about 100 nm above the original surface of the wafer,” ’446 patent col. 6 11.12 . . .
. . . Id., col.2 11.56-57, col.3 11.12-13. . . . Id., col.6 11.42-47, col.7 11.12-15. . . .
. . . OPINION AND ORDER Stanceu, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs challenge the antidumping duty cash deposit rate of 11.12% . . . same rate as the margin but made a downward adjustment resulting in an applied cash deposit rate of 11.12% . . . Amended Final Results, the two downward adjustments resulted in the applied AD cash deposit rate of 11.12% . . . rate respondent like the 62 other separate rate respondents, the AD cash deposit rate for Cooper is 11.12% . . . Cooper, calculated by subtracting 11.13% and 8.68% from 25.84%. • Cooper’s claims are confined to the 11.12% . . .
. . . 4, p. 2; D.E. 24-3 at § 5.8, p. 15-16; D.E. 24-6 at ’ ¶ 4; D.E. 24-10 at ¶ 5, p. 2; D.E. 24-11 at § 11.12 . . . 24-11 at § 16(h); D.E. 24-11 at § 5,8; D.E. 24-11 at § 10; D.E. 24-12 at ¶4, p. 2;,.D.E. 24-13 .at § 11.12 . . .
. . . comprising a dynamic or regenerative braking circuit. ’649 patent reexamination certificate col. 3 11.12 . . .
. . . Code §§ 11.12, 12.1(a). . . .
. . . Dodd responded that a separate City Charter provision, § 11.12, prevented the City from repealing the . . . Dodd’s only argument on appeal that Ordinance 12674 was not validly enacted—that City Charter § 11.12 . . . Charter § 11.12 reads: The City of Chattanooga, in the preparation of any digest of its local laws and . . . Charter § 11.12. . . . However, Dodd’s argument ignores the opening clause of Charter § 11.12. . . .
. . . portion of the chamber and thus prevent tilting of the frame or body of the vehicle. ’354 patent col.6 11.12 . . .
. . . [Doc. 1, pg 63, 11.12 b]. . . .
. . . the consumer of services and the identified member of the pool. ’550 Patent col. 2711. 25-44, col. 29 11.12 . . .
. . . describe the channel beam as “generally C-shaped.” 101 patent, col. 5 11. 59-60; ’231 patent, col. 6 11.12 . . . Id. at col. 5 11.12-14. . . .
. . . . § 11.12(d)(l)-(6), and give “written notice of its decision to the debtor,” id. § 11.12(d)(6), before . . . Id. § 3716(a)(3) 28 C.F.R. § 11.12(d)(l)-(6). . . .
. . . The permit prohibited CPBR from storing crude oil with a monthly average TVP of 11.12 psi or greater. . . . Darby emphasized that the permit limits CPBR to storing crude with a TVP of 11.12 psi (corresponding . . . An RVP of 12.75 psi corresponds to a TVP of 11.12 psi at approximately 64 degrees Fahrenheit. . . .
. . . their position: ‘412 Patent col.l 11.21-25, col.l 11.45-47, col.16 11.35-39, col.13 11.24-61, col.16 11.12 . . . .8 11.18 & 31, col.15 11.11-27, col.16 11.57, 61, & 65, col.17 1.28, col.20 11.51, 54, & 62, col.23 11.12 . . . at col.6 11.26-29 (in yellow in the annotated Figure 1), col.16 11.57-60, col.20 11.51— 54, col.23 11.12 . . . See id. at col.16 11.12-21, col.16 11.35-49, col.20 11.39-41, col.22 11.63-66. . . . “thin” display apparatuses, such as liquid crystal displays and plasma displays. ‘366 Patent col.l 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. col. 2 11. 41-43 and col. 5 11.12-15. 3. White. U.S. . . .
. . . with high efficiency by an MPEG method or the like.” '008 Patent col. 6 11. 13-26; '491 Patent col. 6 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. at ¶¶ 11.12-13, 15. . Id. at ¶ 11.14. . Id. at ¶ 11.16. . Id. at ¶II.l 1. . Trans. . . .
. . . Ex. 135 at pdf p. 5. 11.12. . . .
. . . Id. at ¶¶ 11.12-15. . Id. at ¶ 11.16. . Id. at ¶¶ 11.17-18. . Id. at ¶ 11.19. . . . .
. . . Aumayer col. 11.12, col. 5 11.19-31. . . .
. . . Based on the facts expounded supra in paragraphs 11.12-14, the Court finds Exxon made substantial efforts . . .
. . . patients with potential healthcare providers, e.g., physicians and hospitals.” ('060 Patent col. 1 11.12 . . .
. . . input corresponding to attempts to navigate between user interfaces.” '721 patent col.7 1.64-66, col.8 11.12 . . .
. . . D § 11.12. . . .
. . . . § 11.12(1) (flatly prohibiting contributions and spending for election-related speech except to, through . . . , id. § 11.14(1), keep detailed records of all contributions and disbursements exceeding $10, id. § 11.12 . . . Sections 11.12(5)-(6), Reporting of Late Contributions and Expenditures Wisconsin Right to Life also . . . challenges sections 11.12(5)-(6), which impose a special reporting requirement for contributions of $500 . . . disbursements or making independent disbursements shall file periodic reports as provided ss. 11.06, 11.12 . . .
. . . Docket No. 116-3 at 16 (Altamirano testimony at MSPB hearing, at 239, 11.12-25). . . .
. . . low back associated with just age and time that were mild,” Docket No. 129-2 at 6 (Ramos dep. at 46, 11.12 . . . Docket No. 129-2 at 7 (Ramos dep. at 47, 11.12-17). At the Rule 702 hearing, Dr. . . .
. . . Paragraph 11.12, “Violation of Covenants,” stipulates that, should a partner breach any provision of . . .
. . . abbreviations are to be used for the interpretation of the claims and specification.” '188 Patent col. 7 11.12 . . .
. . . agreements of Seller set forth or contained in, this Agreement or any certificate delivered hereunder. 11.12 . . . C at § 11.12. . . . Therefore, Harland Clarke is a third-party beneficiary of the Purchase Agreement under § 11.12. . . . Section 11.12 provides that third-party beneficiaries of the Agreement have “full rights of enforcement . . . because he is a Seller Indemnified Party under § 8.03(a) and an express third-party beneficiary under § 11.12 . . .
. . . the flow of blood through the incision without extending into the blood vessel.” '375 patent, col. 10 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. col. 6 11.12-30. . . .
. . . In the examples, mice were given “commonly available human vaccines.” '139 patent, col. 36, 11.12; col . . .
. . . wireless transceiver and the second wireless transceiver exclusive of the wired link.” 536 Patent col.10 11.12 . . .
. . . (Document 186 at 11.12.) . . .
. . . psychiatric condition of acrophobia appears and can be seen through display 1L ’764 patent col. 15 11.12 . . . Id. col. 15 11.12-22. . . .
. . . think the date of payoff certificate referenced in paragraphs A.l.b.(2) and C.3 should be changed from 11.12 . . .
. . . amounts of sumatriptan and naproxen. 499 patent col.3 11.22-50, col.4 11.1-4, eol.12 11.54-55, col.15 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. col. 7 11.12-14. K-TEC and Vita-Mix compete in the market for commercial blenders. . . .
. . . Patent col.l 1.62-col.2 1.48; '847 Patent col.2 11.10-61; 115 Patent col.2 11.10-61; '455 Patent col.2 11.12 . . .
. . . Finally, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy ¶ 11.12(b), states the following: “[Sec. 1328(a)(1) ] does not . . .
. . . complicated machines which involve the use of steam to aerate or foam the liquid.” '087 Patent col.l 11.12 . . .
. . . Falk, col.l 11.12-17. . . . Falk, col.l 11.12-17. . . .
. . . (Id. at ¶ 39) Neither party disputes that § 11.12 of the Purchase Agreement states that “[t]ime is of . . .
. . . Section 11.12 of the merger agreement, however, provides that “[tjhis Agreement may not be amended except . . .
. . . discussion that watermarking and encryption techniques can be used with the '414 patent. '414 patent col.ll 11.12 . . .
. . . Saltzman, IRS Practice and Procedure, If 11.12[1], at 11-74 (2d ed. 1991), prior to the filing of plaintiff . . . Saltzman, supra, ¶ 11.12[1 ], at 11-74. . . . .
. . . distance of 10.39 feet to a point; THENCE North 84 degrees 28 minutes 56 seconds East for a distance of 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. col. 4 11.12-39. . . . Id. col. 4 11.12-39. . . .
. . . communication links used for determining the location of said electronic device. '758 Patent col.21 11.12 . . .
. . . J.A. 32, eol.2 11.12-14. . . .
. . . Id. col.18 11.1-3, col.19 11.12-15. . . . Id. col.19. 11.12-15. . . .
. . . therapeutic effectiveness for at least twelve hours were not known as of the patent’s filing date, id. col.3 11.12 . . .
. . . See Act of May 27, 1991, 72nd Leg., R.S., ch. 242, § 11.12, 1991 Tex. Gen. . . .
. . . See id. col.2 11.12-13 (describing the invention as “using sublimation techniques”); id. 11.65-67 (“In . . . Id. col.2 11.12-15 and 21-24 (emphasis added). . . . See '130 patent col.8 11.12-35 (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Id. col.6 11.12-14. . . .
. . . Greenspan col.2 11.12-17. . . .
. . . Id. col.5 11.12-25 (emphasis added). Claim 2 recites: 2. . . .
. . . Transcript of January 12, 2011 Evidentiary Hearing at 17 11.12-14; 28 11.11-12. . . . Tr. at 128 11.2-4; 133 11.6-10; 134 11.12-14; 1341.25-135 1.13; 1621.25-163 1.11. . . . .
. . . Limine as to this portion of the recordings is DENIED AS MOOT. (4)Objection # 4 (Exhibit 13T-p.006, 11.12 . . . stated in ruling on Objection # 4, Objection # 5 is also DENIED. (6)Objection # 6 (Exhibit 14T-p.003, 11.12 . . .
. . . See '817 patent, col.1 11.12-14. . . .
. . . Id. col.5 11.58-61, col.6 11.12— 26. . . .
. . . Id. col.ll 11.12-15. . . .
. . . Id. at col.l 11.12-14. . . . Id. at col.l 11.12-16. . . .
. . . Ex. 2 at ¶ 6(c),(d), and Ex. 1 at Part 11.12(a).) . . .
. . . See '544 patent col.5 11.12-13 (explaining that “stored energy acting on plastic can affect the reliability . . .
. . . and assembling said identified information” in claims 1 and 23, '074 patent col.ll 11.31-33, col.14 11.12 . . .
. . . smaller chain wheel or sprocket to a larger chain wheel or sprocket. '291 Patent col.l 11.55-57, col.9 11.12 . . .
. . . Knight Deck, Ex. 1); the Reimbursement Agreement designates New York law (Reimbursement Agreement § 11.12 . . .
. . . See 7 C.F.R § 11.12(a). . . . determination “refused to do so within 30 days of its finality, as required by 7 U.S.C. § 7000 and 7 C.F.R. § 11.12 . . . [sic] § 11.12." . . .
. . . The Florida Bar, Creditors' and Debtors' Practice in Florida § 11.12, at 11-15 (3d. ed. 2007) (citing . . .
. . . provision in the Plan that purported to protect the rights of the insurers in the Coverage Action (§ 11.12 . . .
. . . lumens of said bifurcated base structure to form a continuous extension of that lumen. '458 patent col.6 11.12 . . .
. . . 11.40 11.21 11.64 12.50 12.20 11.65 12.17 11.72 11.89 1998 11.15 11.58 9.98 10.96 11.29 11.21 11.48 11.12 . . .
. . . See '422 patent col. 10 11.12-18; col. 15 11.7-19; col.25 1.27-eol.29 1.25. . . . (citing '422 patent col.12 11.12-16). . . . See, e.g., '422 patent col.12 11.12-16. . . .
. . . Id. col.5 11.12-29 (emphasis added). Humans are not economic food animals. . . .
. . . . § 11.12(a). . . .
. . . In addition, SPA § 11.12 provides for all actions arising out of or relating to the SPA to be heard in . . . The parties agreed in SPA § 11.12 that New York law governs the obligations in the SPA. B. . . . Reading § 2.06 and § 11.12 in conjunction, § 2.06’s arbitration provision pertains to good-faith disputes . . . GAAP, must be filed in court, pursuant to § 11.12. . . . G.E*TRADE Is Entitled to Prejudgment Interest New York law, which, in accordance with SPA § 11.12, governs . . .
. . . Code § PI 11.12(2), and are not required to accept supinely whatever school officials testify to.” . . .
. . . removed and replaced without replacing or disassembling the entire cover system.” '109 patent col.2 11.12 . . .
. . . col.20 11.20-25 (distinguishing “predetermined pressure profile” from straight-line CPAP); id. col.21 11.12 . . .
. . . perpendicular to said axis A in response to said rectilinear movement of said locating pin. '254 patent eol.8 11.12 . . .
. . . Id. col.2 11.12-14. . . .
. . . Id. at col.5 11.12-16. . . .
. . . See, e.g., '054 Patent, col. 11.12-28. . . .
. . . persistent memory devices that each couple to a respective one of the plural computers.” '377 patent eol.3 11.12 . . .
. . . solely by the terminal device but in accordance with respective predefined policies.” '131 patent col.2 11.12 . . .
. . . surge bleed valve to prevent a build up of pressure and maintain sufficient airflow. '194 Patent col.2 11.12 . . .
. . . at least one output device together with said one or more visual representations. '801 patent col.48 11.12 . . . Id. at col.19 11.12-17; see also col.19 11.30-34 (explaining that “raster anti-aliased text” uses “a . . .
. . . called green super-phosphoric acid (‘green SPA’) ] from less desirable black acid.” '391 Patent col.l 11.12 . . .
. . . e.g., '544 patent col.9 1.67 (the trinary code is “responsive to” the binary code) (claim 1); col.7 11.12 . . .
. . . See Pl.’s Resp. at 6 (citing Contract, arts. 2.7, 11.1-11.12; Murray v. . . .