Cases from cite.case.law:

K. D. T. v. STATE, 128 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . (Crim.) 10.18. But the court decided that the jury instruction did not require “actual knowledge.” . . . (Crim.) 10.18. . . .

DOW CHEMICAL CANADA INC. v. HRD CORPORATION d b a v., 909 F. Supp. 2d 350 (D. Del. 2012)

. . . (D.I. 483, Exh. 1 at ¶¶ 1.3, 2.2, 10.18, 10.19). . . .

CHAMPIONSWORLD, LLC, v. UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION, INC. LLC, 890 F. Supp. 2d 912 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . regulations, or was rendered in violation of a party’s fundamental right policy.” 2011 CAS ruling at 24, ¶ 10.18 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 427 F. App'x 511 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . Under the 2006 Sentencing Guidelines, that amount, 10.18 grams of crack cocaine, resulted in a base offense . . .

SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS OF NEVADA, A v. MOUNTAIN VALLEY SPRING COMPANY, LLC,, 646 F.3d 526 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . This Agreement shall become effective upon the date set forth in Paragraph 10.18 hereof and shall remain . . .

In ENDEAVOUR HIGHRISE, L. P. GP, LLC, v. L. P., 432 B.R. 583 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Butcher 14E $981,600.00 $100,000.00 10.18% 01/29/2006 Dan Waldenmaier; Vivian Abobo 15E $975,000.00 $100,000.00 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 6 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Committee proposes the following new instructions: 7.8(a)— Boating under the Influence Manslaughter; 10.18 . . . (a)(b)(c)l 28.15 causing damage to person or property Comment This instruction was adopted in 2009. 10.18 . . .

P. HELMS, v. CERTIFIED PACKAGING CORPORATION, CPC, 551 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . Reiley, supra, § 10.18, pp. 10-25 to 10-26. . . .

P. HELMS, v. CERTIFIED PACKAGING CORPORATION, CPC, 551 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . Reiley, supra, § 10.18, pp. 10-25 to 10-26. . . .

S. A. LITMAN, v. UNITED STATES, B. S. v. f k a v., 81 Fed. Cl. 315 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . Hotels.com obtained an appraisal of the Restricted Shares from Deloitte and used the weighted average of $10.18 . . .

In HERITAGE ORGANIZATION, L. L. C., 375 B.R. 230 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . P 68-3 at APP 157 (¶ 10.18). . . .

In DELTA AIR LINES, INC. v., 374 B.R. 516 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . their alleged right to sue the Bond Trustee for failing to act prudently in accordance with section 10.18 . . .

ENZO THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. OF WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE,, 477 F. Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Va. 2007)

. . . This is because the applicant is obligated under 37 CFR 10.18 to inquire into the underlying facts and . . .

In HYMAN FREIGHTWAYS, INC., 342 B.R. 575 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006)

. . . to pay $3,516,000.00 of chapter 11 administrative expenses resulting in a pro rata distribution of 10.18% . . .

In KLUTCHKO, v. O v. O v., 338 B.R. 554 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . honors in physics from a prestigious college and having practiced for nineteen years as a psychiatrist (10.18 . . .

CITADEL EQUITY FUND LTD. v. AQUILA, INC., 371 F. Supp. 2d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Handbook for Bankr.Profs § 10.18 n. 1 (stating that “[a] bond issuer is not legally defeased, ie., released . . .

In RAY, In In, 314 B.R. 643 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2004)

. . . presently is employed at Nu-Kote working with toners, ink machines and copy machines making about $10.18 . . .

In VAN WAGONER FUNDS, INC., 382 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (N.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . For example, Van Wagoner Funds’ Emerging Growth Fund NAV increased from 9.90 on August 21, 2001 to 10.18 . . . For example, Van Wagoner Funds’ Emerging Growth Fund NAV increased from 9.90 on August 21, 2001 to 10.18 . . .

ABBAD, v. J. AMMAN, C. A., 285 F. Supp. 2d 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . See 2000 Form 10-K, Ex. 10.18 & 10.19 (Orr Aff. ¶ 2, Ex. A). . . . See March 2001 Form 10-Q, Exs. 10.17, 10.18, 10.19 (Orr Aff. ¶ 9, Ex. . . .

J. HOLLAND, Jr. v. FAHNESTOCK CO. INC. a a, 210 F.R.D. 487 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . .”); see also Fleming James, Jr. et al., Civil Procedure § 10.18 (5th ed.2001) (“the third-party defendant . . .

UNITED STATES v. HUTSON,, 19 F. App'x 466 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 10.18 (list of migratory birds covered by Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. §§ 703-711)). . . .

G. BENAVIDEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 177 F.3d 927 (10th Cir. 1999)

. . . Meyer, Medical Malpractice: Bases of Liability § 10.18 (1985) (explaining that transference “is one of . . .

NEWFOUND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF NEWFOUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. A. SEWER,, 34 F. Supp. 2d 305 (D.V.I. 1999)

. . . See Hearing on Motions, Tr. 10.3-10.18. 2. Gauriloff traveled to the East End of St. . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 809 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . . § 10.18(1987). 19C.F.R. § 152.101,in turn, delineates ahierarchy of appraisal methodologies, which . . .

L. BRANSON, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. AMALGAMATED COUNCIL RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PLAN, 126 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . Branson’s 10.18 years of service entitled him to certain vested, non-forfeitable pension rights under . . . Bran-son could not accumulate additional seniority credit under the Plan beyond his already vested 10.18 . . . Greyhound concedes that at the time Branson retired, in 1987, he had accumulated 10.18 years of seniority . . .

McWILLIAMS T. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 960 F. Supp. 1547 (N.D. Ala. 1997)

. . . This principle as stated in Alabama Pattern Jury Instruction 10.18 allows interest on damages for breach . . .

In BMW GROUP I, LTD., 168 B.R. 731 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1994)

. . . remaining $5,500 would be distributed in $550 lots to the other ten creditors who are now getting a 10.18% . . .

WHITE, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PDB KMS B B NFL, 836 F. Supp. 1458 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . findings concerning the scope of the nonstatutory labor exemption, and makes the following findings. 10.18 . . .

In ASSOCIATES, LTD. ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. BALCOR REAL ESTATE FINANCE, INC., 140 B.R. 619 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . Be paid interest at the rate of 10.18 percent, which the Debtor contends is the contract (non-default . . . the Plan is the inclusion of provisions that propose to pay Balcor interest on its Claim at a rate of 10.18 . . .

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Mr. E., 959 F.2d 1039 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . only 2.68 percent, the Commission found that Matson was entitled to a rate of return on rate base of 10.18 . . . concluding that Matson faced relatively less risk than the average U.S. manufacturing firm and (2) that a 10.18 . . . reduction of 1.25 percentage points for relative risk yielded an adjusted benchmark rate of return of 10.18 . . . after reviewing evidence relating to Matson’s ability to attract capital, ultimately concluded that a 10.18 . . . See generally id. § 552.6(b). . (11.93 percent) — (0.5 percent) — (1.25 percent) = 10.18 percent. . . . .

ANSELL INCORPORATED, v. SCHMID LABORATORIES, INC. NSL,, 757 F. Supp. 467 (D.N.J. 1991)

. . . Sales 1990 Shares Based on Units Carter Wallace 62.29% Schmid 19.64% Ansell 10.18% NSL 4.73% American . . .

R. G. v., 94 T.C. 738 (T.C. 1990)

. . . structured like the 14-day repo, but its specific terms were $59,238 million principal amount at a rate of 10.18 . . . two repos, calculated as follows: $59,238 million X 10.50% X 14/360 = $241,888.50 $59,238 million X 10.18% . . . weighted-average interest rate GSDII owed J&L under the repos was approximately .10.28 percent (10.50 X 14/45 + 10.18 . . . maturity days Rate paid by + paid by = GSDII (to) GSDII net loss J&L $60 10.21 14 10.50 $6,000.00 31 10.18 . . .

In MELBOURNE, a k a MILBOURNE, a k a v. MID- PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY,, 108 B.R. 522 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . Rebate Disability Insurance Charge Disability Insurance Rebate 8/16/84 $ 13.22 $ 10.18 $ 37.22 $ 29.04 . . .

BROWN, By v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . 44.14 35.18 Avondale West 45 226 271 16.61 15.91 Belvoir 146 90 236 61.86 62.78 Bishop 36 306 342 10.53 10.18 . . .

v., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 726 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . . § 10.18(a) (1980), and to Customs Pub. . . .

FIGURE FLATTERY, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 720 F. Supp. 1008 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . . § 10.18(a) (1980), and to Customs Pub. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCM CORPORATION,, 667 F. Supp. 1110 (D. Md. 1987)

. . . mist in a concentration greater than 70 milligrams per cubic meter of exhaust gas (“mg/m3”), COMAR 10.18 . . .

WESTCO PRODUCTS, INC. v. SHEARSON AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., 649 F. Supp. 1121 (C.D. Cal. 1986)

. . . 1,000 shares of Pacific Gas & Electric 12.80 percent preferred, 5,057 shares of Pacific Gas & Electric 10.18 . . .

L. J. v., 87 T.C. 349 (T.C. 1986)

. . . Size Weight multiple Amsted .3277 3.44 .635 .15 5.77 x .635 x .15 = .5496 Brenco .8791 5.98 .735 .20 10.18 . . .

TERRE DU LAC ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. TERRE DU LAC, INC. Du Du Du a CIT O., 772 F.2d 467 (8th Cir. 1985)

. . . Callmann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 10.18 at 107-08 (4th ed. 1982) (use of tying . . .

ZAMORE v. E. DYER,, 597 F. Supp. 923 (D. Conn. 1984)

. . . Schwartz, Administrative Law § 10.18 (1982). . . .

K. McBRIDE, J. v. MAHONEY,, 573 F. Supp. 913 (D. Mont. 1983)

. . . The average deviation for Senate districts is 2.40%, and the total deviation is 10.18%. . . .

REED, Jr. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 703 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . The black percentage of sixth level supervisors grew from .59% in 1970 to 10.18% in 1979 with a growth . . .

LOVE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U. S. D M UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 704 F.2d 100 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . . §§ 10.1 — 10.18, and petitions for the issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule pursuant to 24 C.F.R . . .

LONG, v. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT,, 428 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Based on this information, appellant paid a total of $4,092.27 to purchase his 10.18 years of prior service . . . The prehearing stipulation listed two issues: (1) whether Long was entitled to credit at 2% for his 10.18 . . .

JACKSON, v. PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, a, 550 F. Supp. 869 (N.D. Ala. 1982)

. . . December 15,1943 4.04 10.10 9.20 387.29 June 15,1944 4.04 10.10 9.68 407.07 December 15,1944 4.04 10.10 10.18 . . .

CARLINGSWITCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 500 F. Supp. 223 (Cust. Ct. 1980)

. . . articles under item 807.00 is usually on the basis of constructed value or cost of production (19 CFR 10.18 . . .

v., 85 Cust. Ct. 63 (Cust. Ct. 1980)

. . . articles under item 807.00 is usually on the basis of constructed value or cost of production (19 CFR 10.18 . . .

TREADWAY COMPANIES, INC. v. CARE CORPORATION, Dr. W. CARE CORPORATION, Dr. W. v. FAIR LANES, INC. R. L. B. CARE CORPORATION v. FAIR LANES, INC. R. L. B., 490 F. Supp. 668 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . On October 30, Care filed its third amended Schedule 13D, stating that it owned 10.18% of Treadway stock . . .

P. ROBISHAW G. v. UNITED STATES, 616 F.2d 507 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . Both parties have treated Sandra (Robishaw) Hill’s 112 shares (or 10.18 percent) of Manufacturing’s stock . . .

ALCES P. ROBISHAW AND JOHNLYN G. ROBISHAW v. THE UNITED STATES, 222 Ct. Cl. 474 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . Both parties have treated Sandra (Robishaw) Hill’s 112 shares (or 10.18 percent) of Manufacturing’s stock . . .

DUBIN WESTON, INC. v. LOUIS CAPANO SONS, INC., 394 F. Supp. 146 (D. Del. 1975)

. . . the amount of $2,400,000 bearing interest at the rate of 9x/¿% per annum for a term of 25 years, or a 10.18% . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . also claims a diversion mileage charge of $5.18, plus the $5 flat diversion charge, or a total of $10.18 . . . (i) The plaintiff is not entitled to recover the $10.18 referred to in paragraph (f). 29. . . .

J. TOOMBS, G. L. v. W. FORTSON, Jr., 277 F. Supp. 821 (N.D. Ga. 1967)

. . . —10.91 18,015 71 2 -15.14 34,319 DeKalb and Rockdale Counties (73, 74, 75 with 12 seats averaged) +10.18 . . . These districts, averaged, are underrepresented to the extent of +10.18 per cent based on the 1960 census . . . Based on the Health Department estimates the underrepresentation in these districts had increased from +10.18 . . .

B L FARMS CO. L. B L Co. v. UNITED STATES W., 238 F. Supp. 407 (S.D. Fla. 1964)

. . . reluctance of the courts to expand the legislatively-declared scope of such deductions. 2 Mertens Sections 10.18 . . .

v. E. a c Co. E. a c Co. v., 48 C.C.P.A. 66 (C.C.P.A. 1961)

. . . 23.11 aluminum, .09 iron, .30 calcium oxide, trace of magnesium oxide, 5.05 per cent potassium oxide, 10.18 . . .

GOLDING- KEENE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES E. a c Co., 183 F. Supp. 947 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . 23.11 aluminum, .09 iron, .30 calcium oxide, trace of magnesium oxide, 5.05 per cent potassium oxide, 10.18 . . .

v. E. a c Co., 44 Cust. Ct. 169 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . 23.11 aluminum, .09 iron, .30 calcium oxide, trace of magnesium oxide, 5.05 per cent potassium oxide, 10.18 . . .

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. LOUISVILLE AND JEFFERSON COUNTY AIR BOARD,, 269 F.2d 811 (6th Cir. 1959)

. . . See: 2 McQuillin on Municipal Corporations, supra, § 10.18 at 623. . . .

v., 30 T.C. 285 (T.C. 1958)

. . . S. 638; 2 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 10.18. . . .

McWHIRTER v. MONROE CALCULATING MACH. CO., 76 F. Supp. 456 (W.D. Mo. 1948)

. . . the discounts allowed amounted to 7.36 percent of the gross sales; in 1940, 8.07 percent; in 1941, 10.18 . . .

v., 8 T.C. 407 (T.C. 1947)

. . . Mertens, in his Law of Federal Income Taxation, vol. 2, sec. 10.18. says: Constructive Payments as Deductions . . .

KANSAS CITY LIFE INS. CO. v. DAVIS, 95 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1938)

. . . When the insured, on December 11, 1935, sent $10.18, which would pay his .premiums to December 1, 1935 . . . Hence the insured did not owe the company the $10.18 on the premiums payable on or before December 1, . . . If, before January 1, 1936, the company had applied the $10.18, which it held subject to insured’s order . . . On December 10, 1935, the company received from the insured a cash remittance of $10.18 to apply on the . . . insured a letter inclosing an application for reinstatement of his policy, together with a check for $10.18 . . . to “12-1-35” and at the same time entered in the “Premiums Paid” column under “Amount” the figures $10.18 . . . On February 15, 1936, one David Engelke deposited the sum of $.10.18 with the California managers of . . . was paid in cash, the question then remaining is: Did the acceptance by the company of the check for $10.18 . . .

UNITED STATES v. OREGON, 295 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1935)

. . . Of the frontage disposed of, 4.90% is that acquired by individuals and the remaining 10.18% is school . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PARAMOUNT FAMOUS- LASKY CORPORATION, 57 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1932)

. . . Goldwyn.................... 10.18 60 11.38 +11.8 First National..................... 2.57 46 8.72 +34 . . .

HUGH L. GALLAHER ET AL. v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 19 Ct. Cl. 564 (Ct. Cl. 1884)

. . . centum on account of the failure of the Board to pay in cash, thus making the cost per perch of masonry $10.18 . . . . .... 123 Cost per perch....................■................. $8 73 “ Deduct this from the cost ($10.18 . . .